Archive for 17 Feb 2009

Gun control is an issue that the left has espoused as their own. Unfortunately, as usual, they are wrong on this issue as well.

Time and again, data proves the Brady anti-gun nut jobs wrong, and yet they still lie about it.

Here’s some more data that proves Brady’s anti-gun stance is knee jerk at best, downright dishonest at worst.

Howard Nemerov explores this in detail:

Another Brady hallucination: More guns, more ‘gun violence’ (Part 1)

A recent USA Today article discussed pending legislation on the open carrying of holstered handguns. It also afforded the Brady Campaign’s president an opportunity to display his knowledge of the situation:

Says Paul Helmke, president of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, which opposes open-carry laws: “We don’t want more people carrying guns either openly or concealed because the more guns you have in a situation, the more likely you are to get gun violence.” [Emphasis added]

The following series examines various government datasets to test Helmke’s “more guns, more violence” theory.

More

Back them into a corner with the facts, and they tend to get vicious. Here we have the left getting clobbered with the fact that global warming is bullshit and they stack the deck in their favor in order to make their case, and still fuck it up.

Travesty–Rep. Inslee’s behavior at Energy & Commerce hearing

I just watched the Energy & Commerce Subcommittee hearing on “The Climate Crisis: National Security, Public Health, and Economic Threats.”

Committee rules allow the minority one-third of the witnesses. Originally, there were to be four majority witnesses, which works out to only one minority witness, or one-fourth (because two witnesses would equal two-fifths–slightly more than one-third). However, when Chairman Markey learned that Dr. Patrick Michaels of the Cato Institute was to be the minority witness, he added a 5th majority witness, Prof. Daniel Schragg of Harvard University. So the decks were stacked against Michaels 5 to 1.

More

Global whining in the news:

Travesty-Rep. Inslee’s Behavior at Committee Hearing
Marlo Lewis, Globalwarming.org, 12 February 2009

The Collapse of Climate Policy
Roger Pielke Jr., Prometheus, 7 February 2009

Obama’s Extreme team on Energy
Ben Lieberman, FoxNews.com, 6 February 2009

Video: Heartland Institute Exposes Fear Mongering
Heartland Institute, 5 February 2009

Carbon Collapse Threatens Green Dreams
Sarah Arnott, The Independent, 9 February 2009

Climate Change Paradox: New Wind Power Doesn’t Reduce Emissions
Anselm Walderman, De Spiegal, 10 February 2009

Energy Secretary Floats a Carbon Tax
AFP, 12 February 2009

Here’s a roundup of the Obama nonsense around the web.

The Only Thing to Fear

by Bill O’Reilly

Fear is a great motivator. Back in 1958, one small nun controlled 60 unruly kids in the third grade class at St. Brigid’s School in Westbury, N.Y. We all learned to read and do math. We all memorized our prayers. Why? Fear. That good sister wielded a mean ruler.

In politics, fear also can get things done. President Bush used the fear of another terror attack to convince Americans to support the Patriot Act and an aggressive worldwide war against terrorism. The results were mixed, but Bush had little problem getting the money and consensus he needed.

More

Related:

Democrats, Health Care “Reform,” And Your “Duty To Die”

by Austin Hill

Welcome to the Era of Obama. You now have a duty to die.

I’m not saying that someday you will die (that’s a given).

And I’m not saying that you should be given the “right to die” – – the freedom to take your own life, or to direct your Doctor to put you out of your misery – – that’s something entirely different.

I’m saying that someday, if current trends continue, your United States Government will determine that you have a “duty,” an obligation, to die.

More

Related:

The Rhetorical President

by Janice Shaw Crouse

The use of language to persuade is a skill much admired since ancient times. Few people become leaders without the ability to move others to agree with their arguments. Rightly understood, rhetoric is only one of the tools of persuasion; the other two, logic and dialectic, are required to truly change peoples’ minds. During the presidential campaign, Barack Obama awed the media and voters alike with his rhetorical skills. He continues to awe as he uses rhetorical manipulation to sell the stimulus package to the American public.

More

Related:

Image Is Everything

by Lorie Byrd

If you’ve heard it once, you’ve probably heard it a hundred times – in politics, perception is reality. In the age of Obama, that is more true than ever. Facts don’t always matter so much in politics. It’s more about image.

“Peter Perfect” is a reality show my family watches from time to time. The star of the show, Peter Ishkans, goes into struggling small businesses and helps them create a new look and a new marketing strategy to hopefully set them on the track to success. Ishkans sums up the philosophy behind his approach at the beginning of each show – “If you change your image, you will change your life.” The same could be said of the political world on a broader scale. If you create a successful image, you can change a country. If that country is America, you can even change the world.

More

On the porkulus bill. This is bad for America. In fact, it will make things much worse than they are. I ask all of you to hold Obama and his cronies in Congress accountable for this. It is their doing. If it succeeds, America will no longer be the same one you grew up with. It will be similar to Hugo Chavez’ Venezuela.

As I am sure you can tell, and at least 70% of America agrees, the so called ‘stimulus’ bill is a true porker. I can’t express my anger in the way I would like, you know, my id is trying to free itself. Psych folks should get that one.

If not: id.

Overstimulation

By Jon N. Hall

When Democrats campaigned to retake Congress in 2006, they ran on PAYGO.

PAYGO (pay-as-you-go) is a commitment to not expand the federal budget deficit. With PAYGO, spending for new programs would be “deficit-neutral,” as it would be offset by cuts elsewhere in the budget. Nancy Pelosi said she was committed to PAYGO and wanted PAYGO to be “the law of the land.”

Fiscal Year 2007 began October 1, 2006, when the Republicans were still the majority party. The federal budget deficit for FY 2007 was $162 billion. The Democrats have been in control of the budget for the last two fiscal years, and the deficit for FY 2009 is now estimated to hit $1.2 trillion. So, whatever happened to PAYGO? Unfortunately, PAYGO seems to be dead.

When the dimensions of the financial crisis became apparent in September 2008, pundits opined that the Democrats’ plans for universal health care and other new programs would need to be shelved; there just wasn’t any money for new spending.

But now the Democrat Congress tells America that the economy needs a “jolt,” a “jumpstart,” a stimulus bill entailing massive deficit spending. At a conference for House Democrats on February 5, President Obama mocked those who differed with him on the stimulus bill:

So then you get the argument, “Well, this is not a stimulus bill, this is a spending bill.” [Dramatic pause.] What do you think a stimulus is? That’s the whole point.

If mere deficit spending could produce an economic stimulus, then America should have been stimulated every year since 1930. The most generous accounting for the federal budget (the “unified budget”) shows that Congress produced 12 balanced budgets in 79 years. There were three immediately after World War II; four in the 1950s; FY 1969; and four during the recent bubble economy, FY 1998 through 2001. So during the last 40 years Congress has stimulated us for 90 percent of the time.[1]

More

Related:

Unstimulated

by Salena Zito

If you placed a bet during the presidential campaign season on whether Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid were serious about hitting the ground running when they took over Washington, you probably have extra change in your pocket.

Whether it is George Bush with Iraq or Obama with the economy, politicians always have a bias for action. Obama’s action today is economic recovery — on speed.

The rush by the White House and Congress to “fix” things has been mind-numbing. But can’t anyone pause long enough to make sure that what’s being signed into law really is the right thing?

More

Related:

The Stimulus: Yes We Can’t

by David R. Stokes

Addressing the Democratic Party faithful last week in Williamsburg, Virginia, President Barack Obama brought the house down with a now-famous bit of political sarcasm about the stimulus package. The bill is now ready for the president’s signature, having emerged from the congressional laws-and-sausages-making mill. The specialty is pork sausage, by the way.

During his remarks that night, Mr. Obama mocked some who have been characterizing the package as merely a “spending bill.” He asked, “What do you think a stimulus is? That’s the whole point.” Then as the audience burst into laughter and applause (one could almost hear a Ralph Kramden-like “Har Har Hardy Har Har”), he added, “No, seriously, that’s the point.”

Seriously? Really?

More

Related:

Billions and Billions and Billions… Oh My!

The massive government interference and spending bill known as the stimulus package has passed Congress and awaits President Obama’s signature. Throughout the legislative process, it was disheartening to see just how much was spent on earmarks. Remember when the Democrats took control of the House, and Nancy Pelosi vowed to reform earmarks?

Now, during this debate, the arrogance of the left-wing Washington elite was taken to a new level. Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) actually spoke before Congress and said that the American people don’t care about wasteful earmarks. President Obama stood before the American people at his primetime press conference and said the bill has NO pork at all. Come on! Let’s take a look at how wrong he really is…

More

Want to know where all that pork is going and how much?

http://www.stimuluswatch.org/

Very extensive site with all the details. Lists everything out in different ways.

This shit will make you gag. America is really going to suffer with this one. Your government – Providing hours of entertainment at the click of a mouse!

Here’s a tidbit: $17,500,000,000 is the most expensive, one of the least necessary and not even going to one of the 50 states. Puerto Rico is getting the lions share on one of its pet projects. Fucking sick.

Took a Weekend

Posted: 17 Feb 2009 in Uncategorized

Took a weekend break.

I needed to chill and not get all worked up over politics for a bit. It helps keep the blood pressure on an even keel.

Well, enough of that shit. Back to the old grind stone.