Obama: Turning America into a ‘deadbeat nation’ …

Posted: 18 Jan 2012 in Buyers' Remorse, Comarade Obama, Democrats, Economics, Failure, Government, Neo-Marxists, Obama, Politics, SCOAMF, Socialism, Stupid People, Tax, WTF Files
Tags: , , , , ,

Just noticed this. Back on the 6th of January, Marco Rubio fired off a scathing letter to Obama in reference to him wanting to raise the debt ceiling yet again. If this were to happen, then America’s debt would be in excess of $16 trillion.

Way to go moron. Add more to the debt, don’t do shit about the spending, stop a jobs project that actually makes sense to do while you’re at it. Obama is a stuttering cluster fuck of a miserable failure. (SCOAMF).

Rubio in letter to Obama: You are turning America into a ‘deadbeat nation’

by Jason Mattera

In a scathing letter sent to Barack Obama​ this morning, Senator Marco Rubio said that under the President’s first term in office, “more and more people have come to believe that America is becoming a deadbeat nation.”

Rubio went on to pledge that he would challenge any further increase in the debt ceiling, arguing that “we [Congress] need to make it routine to actually spend no more than we take in.” In the letter obtained by HUMAN EVENTS, the Florida Senator said that President Obama’s upcoming request to increase the debt ceiling by a whopping $1.2 trillion will cause the nation’s public debt to surpass the $16 trillion mark.

via Rubio in letter to Obama: You are turning America into a ‘deadbeat nation’ – HUMAN EVENTS.

Here’s the letter:

Comments
  1. UNeverKnow's avatar UNeverKnow says:

    As far as “vile” groups are concerned, one need look no further than a blog wherein the term “SCOAMF” is used in reference to the President of the United States. There’s this FoxNewsPundit-induced haze that has Republicans thinking that the whole country thinks Obama is a complete failure. As per polling, he has been hovering within 50%. If Obama has 50% general approval in the country, and Mitt Romney can’t even get 40% approval against the current jokester Republican field (sans Paul), in a state he lived in/next to, and campaigned in for years, that does not bode well. It’s pretty obvious Paul votes won’t gravitate towards Mitt in the general election, not to mention most “hardline conservatives” are already considering voting for Mitt

    • 1IDVET's avatar 1IDVET says:

      I am of the mind that whomever is running against Obama, that’s who I am voting for.
      Of course, the real story isn’t the Presidential election, what really matters is the makeup of Congress.
      The more liberal asshats that get replaced in this next election, the better. Especially in the Senate.